zlacker

[parent] [thread] 11 comments
1. voisin+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:28:07
non-Elon-related so far
replies(3): >>ronsor+u >>robswc+11 >>dkarra+V2
◧
2. ronsor+u[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:29:43
>>voisin+(OP)
Soon: "New CEO of xAI revealed to be Sam Altman"
replies(4): >>malfis+75 >>alphad+rb >>adharm+4m >>MVisse+LK
◧
3. robswc+11[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:31:16
>>voisin+(OP)
If it comes out Elon had a hand in this, I might as well cancel my Netflix.
replies(1): >>golerg+j4
◧
4. dkarra+V2[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:40:50
>>voisin+(OP)
yeah I'm sure he'll have something stupid to say about it very soon to attract the attention to himself.
◧◩
5. golerg+j4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:47:58
>>robswc+11
You still need it to check Silicon Valley references.
◧◩
6. malfis+75[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:52:06
>>ronsor+u
I'm sure there's a non compete clause in his employment
replies(1): >>riraro+sc
◧◩
7. alphad+rb[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:27:57
>>ronsor+u
That would be happening but Elon won't want to be overshadowed
replies(1): >>Havoc+6i
◧◩◪
8. riraro+sc[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:34:28
>>malfis+75
Unlikely, non-compete clauses are not enforceable in California.
replies(1): >>manque+kr1
◧◩◪
9. Havoc+6i[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:07:22
>>alphad+rb
And then in a plot twist it turns out Elon was the AGI
◧◩
10. adharm+4m[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:43:49
>>ronsor+u
Or Musk returns to the board of OpenAI after a hiatus.
◧◩
11. MVisse+LK[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 05:45:59
>>ronsor+u
Never, Elon despised Sam's pivot from non-profit to for-profit. He invested 100M in the beginning.
◧◩◪◨
12. manque+kr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 11:57:58
>>riraro+sc
Not for principals/ founders. The law applies to employees.
[go to top]