zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. banana+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:28:06
> The Open AI board letter, representing just 4 people, screams butt hurt and personal disagreements.

"screams butt hurt"? the board put out a blog post saying the CEO had lied so badly they'd insta-sacked him.

replies(1): >>dougmw+A2
2. dougmw+A2[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:38:25
>>banana+(OP)
It’s quite rare for these board communications to say anything of substance at all. You let the PR folks work their magic and manage the narrative. This reads like 4 people out of their depth desperately trying to justify themselves.

I would not be surprised if it turns out Microsoft has a multibillion dollar, complex financial instrument axe on the necks of these people by Monday forcing a sale or a new management structure that gives them more control.

replies(1): >>OkayPh+y9
◧◩
3. OkayPh+y9[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:16:33
>>dougmw+A2
The board of OpenAI has their hands on the ultimate self-destruct button, though. If M$ made a power play, worse case scenario they end up with ownership of the for-profit OpenAI, but they'd still have no control of the non-profit, which owns the intellectual property.

If the deal goes sideways, the board of OpenAI (the nonprofit) could just dump everything onto the open internet. All M$ has is a substantial but minority stake in a company that the non-profit OpenAI owns all the beef of.

[go to top]