zlacker

[parent] [thread] 14 comments
1. WestCo+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:03:12
Link to MS statement https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/11/17/a-statement-from...

In my opinion, I'd say the shortness and lack of details backs up the story that they had no idea. You'd see way more words if a marketing department had it's hands on something like this. This was 100% a get something out asap job.

replies(5): >>catchn+P1 >>mcast+y3 >>paxys+z3 >>oars+6q >>paulco+zD
2. catchn+P1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:11:56
>>WestCo+(OP)
this is “naked gun”-level “nothing to see here.”
3. mcast+y3[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:19:16
>>WestCo+(OP)
I don’t see any verbiage that implies Microsoft had no idea. If Microsoft was the aggressor, of course they would play dumb and disclose as little as possible.
4. paxys+z3[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:19:16
>>WestCo+(OP)
Yup this is definitely a "our stock has fallen 2% on the news, hurry up and say something to investors!" kind of letter.
replies(2): >>SilasX+Hd >>gen220+gB
◧◩
5. SilasX+Hd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:08:45
>>paxys+z3
Just for once I’d like to see such a statement look like, “You sheep probably want a comment on today’s news. We’re not doing that. We’re just content to buy up all the shares you’re panic-dumping. Looking forward to flipping them back to you next week when you panic in the other direction.”

(Assuming they have some plan that gives them the flexibility to trade shares directly on the market like that. I think $GME had something like this?)

Edit: And, of course, actually mean it, unlike Caroline Ellison and the $22 FTT: https://twitter.com/carolinecapital/status/15892874579753041...

replies(2): >>bmitc+Uq >>jliptz+9o1
6. oars+6q[view] [source] 2023-11-18 02:32:14
>>WestCo+(OP)
Copying what was posted here in case they update or change it:

----

A statement from Microsoft Chairman and CEO Satya Nadella Nov 17, 2023 | Microsoft Corporate Blogs

As you saw at Microsoft Ignite this week, we’re continuing to rapidly innovate for this era of AI, with over 100 announcements across the full tech stack from AI systems, models, and tools in Azure, to Copilot. Most importantly, we’re committed to delivering all of this to our customers while building for the future. We have a long-term agreement with OpenAI with full access to everything we need to deliver on our innovation agenda and an exciting product roadmap; and remain committed to our partnership, and to Mira and the team. Together, we will continue to deliver the meaningful benefits of this technology to the world.

◧◩◪
7. bmitc+Uq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:38:29
>>SilasX+Hd
It's hilarious that people are commenting about Microsoft being "down". It's up over a $100 per share since the beginning of the year and at an all-time high.
◧◩
8. gen220+gB[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 03:55:56
>>paxys+z3
It began the day up 54.75% YTD and ended the day up 50.6% YTD. They've had single-day downswings as large or larger like 30 times this year alone. Microsoft is fine.
replies(1): >>raydev+Fz2
9. paulco+zD[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:14:11
>>WestCo+(OP)
What would make you think a marketing department would potentially be involved here? Besides the obvious Marketing = Bad connection prevalent here on HN?
replies(1): >>dehrma+YT
◧◩
10. dehrma+YT[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 06:15:17
>>paulco+zD
I think they just mixed up marketing and corporate comms.
◧◩◪
11. jliptz+9o1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 10:48:55
>>SilasX+Hd
Retail didn’t move MSFT stock yesterday on that news. It was HFT bots reacting to the news. Nobody panicked.
replies(1): >>SilasX+Ip2
◧◩◪◨
12. SilasX+Ip2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 17:21:27
>>jliptz+9o1
Nobody panicked? I suspect that's beyond what your current evidence, plus general knowledge of market behavior, can justify.
replies(1): >>jliptz+3s2
◧◩◪◨⬒
13. jliptz+3s2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 17:33:58
>>SilasX+Ip2
People may have panicked, but the move happened too quickly for a human to react in time
replies(1): >>SilasX+Gv2
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
14. SilasX+Gv2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 17:52:47
>>jliptz+3s2
You still can't justify a claim that nobody panic-sold, given what you know. Let's try to stick to claims we have a basis to believe, instead of fighting noise with noise.

A more reasonable claim from your epistemic state could be something like, "There was no major crash from the news, as might be seen in a general panic."

◧◩◪
15. raydev+Fz2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 18:11:34
>>gen220+gB
No one is saying they aren't fine, but Microsoft has a lot of shares, and shareholders can be very annoying. If Satya didn't make a statement there'd be dozens of Important People breathing down his neck.
[go to top]