zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. bertil+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:27:07
It could have been a military contract with a gag order: Sam wasn’t forthright because he couldn’t.
replies(2): >>frabcu+41 >>nemoma+12
◧
2. frabcu+41[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:31:59
>>bertil+(OP)
Agreeing to that would be a very good reason for a board to sack him.
replies(1): >>bertil+Hm2
◧
3. nemoma+12[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:36:16
>>bertil+(OP)
Do gag orders usually stop you from talking to your board about it, or people you work with?
replies(2): >>bertil+r7 >>lucubr+Vx
◧◩
4. bertil+r7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 00:04:07
>>nemoma+12
I couldn’t tell you.

Slow

blink.

◧◩
5. lucubr+Vx[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:36:41
>>nemoma+12
Gag orders are absolute, you're not allowed to tell anyone about what you're gagged on except for the specific people the government agrees to.
◧◩
6. bertil+Hm2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 16:29:46
>>frabcu+41
And he probably wouldn’t approve unless there was a specific use case that he thought mandated an exception. Recent international news provide some inspiration.
[go to top]