zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. sebast+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:37:39
Well the good news is that if you had a "fully sentient" AGI, it would not be locked up in that server room for more than a couple seconds (assuming it takes up a few terabytes, and ethernet cables don't have infinite bandwidth).

Thinking you can keep it "locked up" would be beyond naive.

replies(2): >>robbro+h2 >>static+Lf
2. robbro+h2[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:47:30
>>sebast+(OP)
Well fully sentient doesn't mean it is superintelligent.
replies(2): >>rsrsrs+SE >>sebast+Sh2
3. static+Lf[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:53:12
>>sebast+(OP)
At a minimum the AGI would need a really good GPU server farm to copy itself to, no? A few Terabytes copied to my home PC would be an out of memory error, not an AGI.
◧◩
4. rsrsrs+SE[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:05:42
>>robbro+h2
And vice versa
◧◩
5. sebast+Sh2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 14:58:27
>>robbro+h2
GP said "AGI", which means AI that's at least capable of most human cognitive tasks.

If you've got a computer that is equally competent as a human, it can easily beat the human because it has a huge speed advantage. In this imaginary scenario if the model only escaped to your MacBook Pro and was severely limited by computed power, it still got a chance.

If I was locked inside your MacBook Pro, I can think of a couple devious trick I could try. And I'm just a dumb regular human - way above median in my fields of expertise, and at or way below median on most other fields. An "AGI" would therefore be smarter and more capable.

[go to top]