zlacker

Why are you even able to write this lie, "Ai doesnt “learn”"? I mean, you can literally read extensively in books, papers, and code all about how neural networks function.

>>pk-pro+(OP)
Arguably once the AI has been created by training, it doesn’t learn any more in the form of an LLM. The LLM is the result of the learning/training, but then in actual operation it doesn’t do any learning.

>>layer8+83
Adding "learn" to my list of key words indicating that a discussion is 100% guaranteed to degrade into quibbling over semantics.

Others are "think" and "conscious".

>>layer8+83
So what's your point? How does the fact that an LLM learns only during training make it any less "learning"?

>>pk-pro+(OP)
If we redefine the meaning of words then anything is true.

>>pk-pro+3f
My point is that the LLM is the result of the training. It is not what is doing the training. Like a program is the result of coding. A program doesn’t itself perform the coding. An LLM being created by a training process is a different mode of operation than using the resulting LLM to generate content.

>>layer8+Bm
So, you are trying to manipulate the words here, and you are trying to say that training is not learning. You are talking out of your ass, dude. Just read about how neural networks work, especially on unsupervised training.