zlacker

Whatever it is, Open AI need to disclose the reason soon, otherwise speculation will undermine the whole AI market.

However big his transgressions may be, it's actual impact is finite, while the speculation can be infinite.

>>boh+(OP)
The whole ai market is rife with ip theft and privacy violations. The cat’s out of the bag.

>>boh+(OP)
Nobody will give a sht in a month.

>>boh+(OP)
Love your quote there: impact finite when speculation isn’t infinite

>>zombiw+43
Hi fellow Zappa fan.

>>boh+(OP)
The average user of ChatGPT has no idea who Sam Altman is.

>>boh+(OP)
My view is that medium- and long- terms are determined by fundamentals of what the technology actually delivers.

OpenAI and ChatGPT are great and gets a lot of mind-share. But they are far from the only game in town and, at this still very-early stage of the tech cycle, the outwardly-visible leader can easily change in months.

>>boh+(OP)
Two predictions:

(1) Unless there is public litigation in involved, OpenAI will not disclose the reason in susbtantial detail.

(2) It will not, more than momentarily, disrupt the whole AI market if they do not.

(If it is something that will disrupt the whole AI market, there is likely to be litigation and public information about the basis of the firing.)

>>boh+(OP)
Kara swisher is reporting it’s a conflict between business goals and nonprofit goals. Unless there’s some conflicting reporting coming out soon, that probably enough to tamp down any speculation that will undermine the whole ai market.