zlacker

> arguably the hottest segment of the tech market

Yes it is arguable. OpenAI is nothing more than a really large piece of RAM and storage around a traditional model that was allowed to ingest the Internet and barfs pieces back up in prose making it sound like it came up with the content.

>>throw5+(OP)
This should be upvoted as the comment of the year.

>>throw5+(OP)
Hey that’s Google also.

>>throw5+(OP)
We've somehow reached the point where the arguments for dismissing AI as hype are frequently more out of touch with reality than the arguments that AGI is imminent.

>>kwerty+a5
Also Redditors.

>>marcus+Da
Savage but entirely justified

>>throw5+(OP)
"No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."

>>marcus+ta
No country in Africa starts with a "K".

>>throw5+(OP)
It absolutely does come up with its own content. It's especially evident when it confabulates apis.

>>throw5+(OP)
IIRC, in a video I saw a couple of days ago, Noam Chomsky referred to LLMs as plagiarists.

>>marcus+ta
Its the same as Covid where people said it was going to kill everyone or was an authoritarian conspiracy. chatGPT is neither the singularity or useless junk. I use it everyday at work to write code but it’s not about to take my job either.

>>baq+9h
If that counts as coming up with its own content, Markov bots have been doing it for decades.

>>8bitsr+lk
Are google search results plagarism?

>>bagels+VI
Web search results are (or at least are supposed to be) attributed by their very nature, and definitely not presented as original creative work.

>>bagels+VI
At least there's no accurate way for a search engine to check for originality. It's like asking a machine to evaluate other machines.

Here's the top-most featured snippet when I google if programming languages had honest slogans: https://medium.com/nerd-for-tech/if-your-favourite-programmi...

Half of the above post is plagiarised from my 2020 post: https://betterprogramming.pub/if-programming-languages-had-h...

>>nullin+je
I'll bite: Kegypt