zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. throw5+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:10:59
Your use of the word "our" is too liberally applied, he was no hero of mine. I believe history will have a very different view of Altman, "Open"AI, and AI in general.
replies(2): >>c0pium+7n >>spuz+wn
2. c0pium+7n[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:03:05
>>throw5+(OP)
That’s the rhetorical “our”.
replies(1): >>Intral+Af1
3. spuz+wn[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:05:14
>>throw5+(OP)
Note I said "heroes", not "hero". I'm making a general statement about how the views people can have about others can evolve over time.
◧◩
4. Intral+Af1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 06:01:09
>>c0pium+7n
> rhetorical

Plural generic first-person possessive pronoun.

replies(1): >>c0pium+LZ2
◧◩◪
5. c0pium+LZ2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 18:24:26
>>Intral+Af1
Is English not your first language? They were making a rhetorical argument about our heroes, whoever they may be.

It’s clear from context that they’re talking about how Sam is a hero of Eric’s and Sam has fallen which is a thing that can happen.

replies(1): >>Intral+GM3
◧◩◪◨
6. Intral+GM3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 23:05:43
>>c0pium+LZ2
> They were making a rhetorical argument about our heroes, whoever they may be.

Yes? That's what "plural generic first-person possessive pronoun" means. I was agreeing with you, mate.

[go to top]