zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. iLoveO+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:42:57
I'm not saying that you're not right, but this definitely wouldn't warrant an instant firing of your CEO.
replies(2): >>jonny_+z >>kristj+U
◧
2. jonny_+z[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:45:17
>>iLoveO+(OP)
Security lapses is still sadly not a fireable offense. It has to be either money related, criminal, or something deeply embarrassing. More embarrassing that being a public anti-semite (like another tech CEO not yet fired by their board).
replies(1): >>vvndom+ZG1
◧
3. kristj+U[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:47:18
>>iLoveO+(OP)
If the CEO attempted to hide it though…
replies(1): >>0x1428+z2
◧◩
4. 0x1428+z2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 21:56:36
>>kristj+U
IDK if it's possible to hide incidents like that
replies(1): >>dragon+G6
◧◩◪
5. dragon+G6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 22:21:16
>>0x1428+z2
Its always possible to try and fail.

If he actually hid it, he wouldn't be in trouble.

◧◩
6. vvndom+ZG1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 09:31:04
>>jonny_+z
In most cases Im not a fan of heavy handed IT security but in this case I'm not sure there is anything they can do to add address security concerns in a sustainable way. Eventually somebody will jailbreak one of these and dump ALL the chats or something catastrophic like that .
[go to top]