zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. shipsc+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 21:06:37
I vote no because New Zealand seems like a poor choice for possessing arms in a bunker.
replies(3):
>>seanw4+A4
>>blangk+8e
>>int_19+tG
◧
2. seanw4+A4
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 21:26:18
>>shipsc+(OP)
If you have money and connections, the laws of the plebs are no longer relevant. You essentially have a right to keep and bear arms anywhere on Earth if you're rich enough.
replies(1):
>>ChainO+5b
◧◩
3. ChainO+5b
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-17 21:54:43
>>seanw4+A4
until locals with more guns and much deeper trust affiliations with other locals decide your money is best spent as they see fit.
◧
4. blangk+8e
[view]
[source]
2023-11-17 22:14:13
>>shipsc+(OP)
Would there be a better place or strategy?
replies(1):
>>rpmism+Ty1
◧
5. int_19+tG
[view]
[source]
2023-11-18 00:28:08
>>shipsc+(OP)
Back when this plan was publicized, you could legally own an AR-15 in New Zealand without much trouble.
It's still the case for bolt- and lever-action rifles and similar stuff.
◧◩
6. rpmism+Ty1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-18 06:57:49
>>blangk+8e
All of Appalachia would be a better place. Anti-development, much more wildlife, not really an invasion target.
[go to top]