zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. willia+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:01:01
Which implies a coup. Four voting against two.

And it could be for any reason, even purely ethical like, “we don’t want to license this technology to better sell products to tweens”.

replies(2): >>bushba+53 >>b112+15
2. bushba+53[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:14:19
>>willia+(OP)
A coup wouldn't have him immediately fired. Instead he'd be placed in some advisory position while they transition in a new CEO. The immediate firing means scandal of some sort.
replies(1): >>digita+0d1
3. b112+15[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:22:38
>>willia+(OP)
How do these board members relate to Microsoft's holdings? Is Microsoft making a play here?

Honestly have no idea, but I'm sure a shift of control could cause this.

◧◩
4. digita+0d1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 03:53:32
>>bushba+53
No. A weak coup would do exactly that. They have to isolate and alienate or they risk the ousted leader coming back or damaging the company.
[go to top]