zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. stavro+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 20:45:06
Because you can know someone non-well and think they're a really good person. It's not strong evidence, but it's not nothing.
replies(2): >>xwdv+Jc >>earthb+jf
2. xwdv+Jc[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:36:43
>>stavro+(OP)
I don’t know Sam Altman well but I do not think he’s a particularly good person, so there’s some counter-evidence.

Personally I welcome this shake up. Some of the things I’ve seen Altman write about are troubling.

3. earthb+jf[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:48:02
>>stavro+(OP)
You can know someone is a bad person from casual interaction, but not vice versa. There's basically no way to know if anyone intelligent is a good person without extremely intense surveillance. I guess with an unintelligent person, you can assume that they're not smart enough to hide if they're doing something really bad, but even then, maybe they're just playing dumb.
[go to top]