zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. campbe+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 20:38:58
From the statement it sounds like the board is still committed to running the company in pursuit of the initial non-profit goals and the transition to a for profit status was because of legal limitations. Really surprising to see this.
replies(1): >>lukev+Ab
◧
2. lukev+Ab[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:20:30
>>campbe+(OP)
Unless Altman was taking actions in furtherance of the for-profit goals, while abandoning the non-profit goals, and not being honest to the board about this.

This actually seems the most probable reason for this given the circumstances and phrasing.

replies(1): >>Iv+Ff
◧◩
3. Iv+Ff[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 21:37:46
>>lukev+Ab
OpenAI switching back to being open would be one of the best news of the decade!
replies(2): >>campbe+lp >>xigenc+G41
◧◩◪
4. campbe+lp[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 22:28:15
>>Iv+Ff
I agree, what a great turn for the public if that's how this evolves.
◧◩◪
5. xigenc+G41[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:54:49
>>Iv+Ff
That’s not going to happen with this board.
[go to top]