zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. kalleb+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-17 14:10:19
It was embraced and extended by Google.
replies(1): >>JLCarv+k8
2. JLCarv+k8[view] [source] 2023-11-17 14:45:29
>>kalleb+(OP)
I was asking for a source so I could look further into this, do you have any?
replies(1): >>kalleb+8a
◧◩
3. kalleb+8a[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 14:57:21
>>JLCarv+k8
Neither me nor GP said that it was started by Google. Just that it was adopted by them as a solution.
replies(1): >>JLCarv+pl1
◧◩◪
4. JLCarv+pl1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-17 19:37:42
>>kalleb+8a
Adopted by Google yes, but since when would Google adopting a technology give them full control over the future of that technology? Surely the other industry members who started RCS also have a say?

And I would argue that the language used implies Google created RCS themselves (it was their idea): "RCS is Google's idea of a solution"

replies(1): >>kalleb+oO2
◧◩◪◨
5. kalleb+oO2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 03:16:05
>>JLCarv+pl1
> since when would Google adopting a technology give them full control over the future of that technology

It's the Microsoft 90's playbook https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...

[go to top]