zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Manfre+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-05 18:17:20
Scale and speed of adoption influencing the impact on the value of the source material.

A person can only service a few projects a year and it takes day or weeks on ingest new knowledge. A trained network only needs to train once and faster than a person, it can then be replicated and is only limited by computing power.

That skews the market and the value of the books. I would not write a book if it was then ingested by and AI and never sold to a person.

replies(1): >>breadw+v5
2. breadw+v5[view] [source] 2023-11-05 18:46:03
>>Manfre+(OP)
If that logic is allowed to take hold, consider this: Would it make sense to charge a smarter person more for reading the same book?

For example, if a college professor reads a book, and then uses the knowledge gained to teach, that reduces the value of the book (assuming the professor doesn't then use the book as the textbook for a course).

replies(1): >>Manfre+KNa
◧◩
3. Manfre+KNa[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-08 19:12:08
>>breadw+v5
It might make sense as a theoretical approximation of the value proposition. But you're going to piss people off if you try, so it's probably not a great sales technique.
[go to top]