zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. teachr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-02 15:57:25
I don't mean to sound flip, but I don't think identifying pathological psychological conditions via web browsing habits is all that difficult. I have a friend who went through a severe depressive episode. As soon as he started watching YouTube at 2am, he started getting ads for depression meds.
replies(2): >>PaulHo+u3 >>aaroni+Zd
2. PaulHo+u3[view] [source] 2023-11-02 16:08:21
>>teachr+(OP)
It's not difficult at all. That's the point. A system like that collects a lot of data and very few people are going to feel that they need to dissimulate.
3. aaroni+Zd[view] [source] 2023-11-02 16:42:17
>>teachr+(OP)
Worse yet, "web browsing habits" is just one neck of the hydra. What you buy (when, as mentioned) serves as strong signal for any number of factors; all your conventional demographics of course...

I'm not in the industry but I am very curious to know if we're already in the conditional-execution phase of surveillance/ad-serving/profile-updating: is there an idea [yet] of serving a challenge, and then both recording how/if it is engaged, with automated graph traversal to "look closer"... all offered stochastically...

The simple way to put that in part is, are we now getting A/B tests run on us explicitly, rather than merely implicitly?

(Personally, I'm 100% off Meta products and TikTok—but am leaking through LinkedIn and, regrettably, Google...)

[go to top]