zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. hirund+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-23 22:26:36
My cheap home thermostat has that frustrating +/- 5 degrees F accuracy. Is it very difficult to build an inexpensive 1 degree sensor?
replies(3): >>harris+n3 >>vGPU+Q3 >>jacque+l8
2. harris+n3[view] [source] 2023-10-23 22:48:23
>>hirund+(OP)
I am curious what an "expensive" one would actually cost, too... It is a car so already a large purchase. I'd pay a bit more for an accurate thermostat.
replies(1): >>mirkul+YE2
3. vGPU+Q3[view] [source] 2023-10-23 22:51:09
>>hirund+(OP)
Apparently +/- 2 degrees is fairly common.

One of the problems is the heat from the device itself, as well as limited airflow creating localized hotspots.

4. jacque+l8[view] [source] 2023-10-23 23:24:47
>>hirund+(OP)
It is if you don't want a calibration step. If you do calibrate then it's no longer an inexpensive part...
◧◩
5. mirkul+YE2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-24 17:50:41
>>harris+n3
It's not just material cost, probably different interface to the sensor so factor in some R&D, approvals, etc. Any time anything, no matter how small or innocuous (bracket, cable, screw, some piece of plastic cover, etc), was changed on a vehicle, it meant a different part number, which meant 6-12 months delay. This is because it has to go through all the testing - usability, fatigue, safety, etc all over again. This is why they pick cheap parts - not because they're cheap, but because they are old and got cheaper over the years, because old = already approved, which makes the lead time a lot less.
[go to top]