zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. johnma+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-23 22:24:47
I wonder if they were concerned someone would use the data to make a decision about leaving a living creature in the vehicle.
replies(2): >>PvtGle+52 >>mirkul+XG2
◧
2. PvtGle+52[view] [source] 2023-10-23 22:36:57
>>johnma+(OP)
or medications or food. I can totally understand the legal liability angle 5° F is not a small margin of error.
◧
3. mirkul+XG2[view] [source] 2023-10-24 17:57:28
>>johnma+(OP)
Now that I think back, I believe you are correct. The decision was based on making a previously-unavailable feature available, which meant people could potentially (be irresponsible and) leave pets/children in the vehicle while relying on an inaccurate sensor, which could open them up to lawsuits.
[go to top]