zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. fancyf+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-14 14:06:10
ISPC is great software. It's a shame in many ways Intel didn't put more resources behind it.
replies(2): >>boulos+yO >>kristj+wC2
◧
2. boulos+yO[view] [source] 2023-10-14 19:51:56
>>fancyf+(OP)
As Bryan mentions in >>37880669 , I would read Matt's post-Intel and post-Google write up of why Intel didn't really invest.

https://pharr.org/matt/blog/2018/04/30/ispc-all if you don't want to follow the comment link again :).

◧
3. kristj+wC2[view] [source] 2023-10-15 15:39:17
>>fancyf+(OP)
I naively thought ISPC turned into the new DPCPP compiler they’re leaning into with their oneAPI marketing. Are those really different lineages?
[go to top]