zlacker

okay, well I'm not a linguist. I wouldn't have chosen to make a dedicated word for a self-portrait picture in an official context over something practical like a singular gender-neutral pronoun. I wouldn't have chosen to make a word's extra definition be its own antonym because people can't help but engage in hyperbole. But society shapes language and its collective usage drives what words are "official".

Inaccurate or not, it's understood by people what "tech debt" means and the point of communication is to express ideas to others. Even if it spits on the queen's english, it furfills its goals. I lack the clout and energy to try and oppose and change such ideas (and to be frank, it wouldn't make the top 50 of things I would influence if given those factors).

>>johnny+(OP)
no one understands tech debt to mean "0 debt", you're making my point for me.

We have 1 poster abusing it and getting called out for it.

>>PH95Vu+VH
If we're talking about the abuse of language: "one person disagreeing" (in this case, the subject themself) is not the equivalent of "getting called out".

>>johnny+RM
You can't argue with my original point so instead you're trying to find something wrong with my wording.

I get to define my intent, not you. You cannot call someone out without disagreeing with the behavior or words that you're calling out. So congratulations on stating the obvious I suppose.

>>PH95Vu+eR4
We're well beyond a flame war, and the worst kind. This isn't Reddit. and to be frank I felt like we were constantly talking past each other despite my attempts to align ourselves. Once we have to resort to insults, especially over how words are used, it's clear we both missed the point.

My thoughts are laid out above. I have nothing more to add on the subject. You win, and I apologize for failing to understand your point.