zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. bakuni+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-12 18:57:13
Isn't it quite obvious that productivity does not scale linearly with time worked? Consistently, I can work 4-6 hours a day at full productivity, and I have to choose less demanding tasks for the other 8-10 waking hours to maximise my productivity and well-being. This is also what I observe in my peers, and while there might be outliers to this, I think the stretch is far less extreme than propagated by some influencers.
replies(1): >>rewmie+Ec
2. rewmie+Ec[view] [source] 2023-10-12 19:49:01
>>bakuni+(OP)
> Isn't it quite obvious that productivity does not scale linearly with time worked?

Irrelevant, and reads as a non-sequitur. OP expressed his personal assertion on laziness, not productivity.

replies(1): >>johnny+503
◧◩
3. johnny+503[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-13 17:16:04
>>rewmie+Ec
laziness and productivity are intertwined, no? They are both relative, but I find it hard to say someone is "lazy" if they only put 30 hours in but outperform the rest of their team by a decent margin. That only works if you think you can get 33% more productivity out of them personally if you pushed harder.

I think it's a notion worth considering in such a conversation.

[go to top]