zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Nextgr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-12 18:39:28
When it comes to Home Assistant, the Pi is actually a much more pragmatic option.

It works out of the box, is very easy to source (hell some brick & mortar stores sell them), has very good Linux support due to its popularity, and makes up a large part of the install base meaning HA support for it is unlikely to get deprecated.

replies(2): >>SamBam+It >>brewda+jv
2. SamBam+It[view] [source] 2023-10-12 20:50:24
>>Nextgr+(OP)
Right, but the fact that running it on a Pi with Linux is the "much more pragmatic solution" is already ruling out about 90% of the US.
replies(1): >>Nextgr+gy2
3. brewda+jv[view] [source] 2023-10-12 21:01:28
>>Nextgr+(OP)
> is very easy to source

I was with you until this point. A Pi hasn't been easy to source for almost 4 years now.

◧◩
4. Nextgr+gy2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-13 14:24:10
>>SamBam+It
Keep in mind that Home Assistant provides ready-made images that behave like an appliance and can auto-update. In fact, it doesn't even give you a shell/SSH by default and such access is discouraged.

Thus the Linux/RaspberryPi underlying complexity is irrelevant to the user - the "complexity" is to dd/BalenaEtcher/etc a downloaded file to an SD card, put the card in the Pi and connect it to power. From there it's available over the network and can be configured through a web browser.

[go to top]