zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. sanswo+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-04 23:01:34
Turbo C++ was my first IDE(a birthday present when I was a kid) and I will always be grateful of it for triggering my love of programming but to say that is even in the same category as a modern IDE is a huge stretch. Of course modern stuff is laggier for most IDE's as it's doing real time analysis on your code as you type. If you want to compare it with a Borland IDE from the 90s open up notepad and start typing.
replies(1): >>pjmlp+2U
2. pjmlp+2U[view] [source] 2023-10-05 09:06:14
>>sanswo+(OP)
Borland IDEs were definitly better than Notepad.
replies(1): >>sanswo+AW
◧◩
3. sanswo+AW[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-05 09:32:43
>>pjmlp+2U
The editor did nothing more than notepad does today and the IDE at least back when I was using it was basically just a compiler, debugger with basic inspection window and stepping and a make system. It wasn't doing realtime formatting of your code, inspection for errors, referencing to other parts of code, autocompletion, syntax highlighting, etc.
replies(1): >>pjmlp+oZ
◧◩◪
4. pjmlp+oZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-05 10:06:55
>>sanswo+AW
Stuck in MS-DOS?

As someone that used all their products from MS-DOS, through Windows 3.x days up to switching to Visual C++ 6.0, I clearly remeber code completion, syntax highlighting and macros, three features that Notepad isn't capable of.

As easily proven, by reading the manuals available in Bitsavers.

replies(2): >>sanswo+s21 >>vetina+Jy1
◧◩◪◨
5. sanswo+s21[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-05 10:37:46
>>pjmlp+oZ
Yeah looks like you're right about at least the syntax highlighting and macros, I can't find any reference to Borland doing code completion back then and what I did find was people from much later complaining that it'd take up to 5 seconds to return suggestions, I used it around 4.5 and really don't remember any of those features though. I guess it was almost 30 years ago now though and I was mostly just interested in making the asteroids do weird things.

So replace Notepad with Notepad++ in my previous comments. There are definitely fast editors that do the same thing as Borland editors did back then the ones like VSC do a whole lot more and support a whole lot more.

replies(1): >>pjmlp+I61
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. pjmlp+I61[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-05 11:21:54
>>sanswo+s21
Besides moving goalposts, Notepad++ still isn't on the same league as Borland's IDEs.
◧◩◪◨
7. vetina+Jy1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-05 14:17:33
>>pjmlp+oZ
Turbo Pascal 7 did syntax highlighting, as well as source-level debugging. That was on top of nice-to-have features like auto-indenting.

It was a DOS, Turbo Vision application.

[go to top]