zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. JohnBo+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-04 17:51:40
Right.

You can't have the thinnest/sleekest possible phone and an easily removable battery. Have to choose.

Frustrating thing is, mainstream phone manufacturers don't give you a choice. There's no option to buy e.g. an a slightly more ruggedized iPhone that is 15% bulkier but gives you easy battery access. That's a thing I'd buy, even if it cost a bit more.

The quest for "sleekness at all costs" made more sense 15-20 years ago, when full-spec smartphones and laptops were clunkier.

Hopefully the tide is turning. Apple is offering beefier and thicker laptops (M1/M2 Macbook Pros) and likewise now gives buyers an option for a beefier "Explorer Edition" watch. No battery access sadly. But hopefully the pendulum might swing the other way a little now.

replies(3): >>sho_hn+D >>alamor+y7 >>tshadd+dK
2. sho_hn+D[view] [source] 2023-10-04 17:54:15
>>JohnBo+(OP)
> Frustrating thing is, mainstream phone manufacturers don't give you a choice.

https://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/phones/galaxy-xcover/galax...

Edit: This is getting downvoted, but it's a regularly-updated phone line from a mainstream manufacturer with decent specs. You can absolutely vote with your wallet here as OP laid out.

3. alamor+y7[view] [source] 2023-10-04 18:24:32
>>JohnBo+(OP)
> You can't have the thinnest/sleekest possible phone and an easily removable battery.

Is this true? Plastic covers seemed thinner than the glass/metal shells that have replaced them. Also, from my limited experience, the batteries in the glued-together phones have adhesive strips that secure them inside the case, which again add a little extra thickness.

I could be wrong about those things, but I stand by my assertion that the plastic snap-fit phones were more durable. Durable enough that they didn't need cases for protection, which above all else rob a phone of its thinness/sleekness.

The first time I dropped a glued-together phone, I cracked the screen. I thought it must have been a fluke, since I'd dropped plastic phones tons and they'd always been fine. I was so sure it was a weird one-off I refused to get a case after having the screen replaced. My girlfriend called me an idiot. Two months later, I dropped the phone again. Now I have a case.

4. tshadd+dK[view] [source] 2023-10-04 21:11:47
>>JohnBo+(OP)
> There's no option to buy e.g. an a slightly more ruggedized iPhone that is 15% bulkier but gives you easy battery access. That's a thing I'd buy, even if it cost a bit more.

Why not buy a $100 rugged waterproof case and an external battery?

replies(1): >>JohnBo+iS2
◧◩
5. JohnBo+iS2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-05 15:42:05
>>tshadd+dK
Surely you understand why a person might want to carry and charge one thing instead of two?

A 25% bulkier "rugged" iPhone 15 Pro would still fit nicely in most people's pockets. Unlike an encased iPhone plus external battery pack.

Like a lot of men, I carry a phone and wallet in one pocket and my keys in another. I don't typically carry a bag. Not gonna carry a battery pack too.

Also, an external battery pack achieves one thing (extended battery life) but not the other -- still wouldn't be able to easily replace the internal battery once it has aged out.

[go to top]