zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. maltal+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-10-03 14:20:39
You’re comparing apples with oranges. Just because both products are called “a watch” doesn’t mean they’re interchangeable.

It’s like comparing a wired phone to a smartphone because they’re both “phones”.

replies(1): >>gregor+C
2. gregor+C[view] [source] 2023-10-03 14:23:03
>>maltal+(OP)
They’re interchangeable in the sense that you can't wear both at the same time.
replies(1): >>manuel+b2
◧◩
3. manuel+b2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-03 14:31:47
>>gregor+C
You can, unless you have only one arm.
replies(1): >>gregor+A4
◧◩◪
4. gregor+A4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-03 14:44:03
>>manuel+b2
You can doesn't mean you should though
replies(1): >>manuel+of
◧◩◪◨
5. manuel+of[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-10-03 15:37:54
>>gregor+A4
But you said that one "cannot" do it.

Oddly enough, I think this - wearing both a smart and an analog watch - is actually a trend [0], which I think makes sense, since analog watches could nowadays be considered purely attire complements.

[0] https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/double-wristing-a-guide-fo...

[go to top]