zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. talos+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-30 15:53:19
Couldn't this be trivially confounded by differing patterns of diet soda consumption between groups with differing likelihoods of autism-diagnosed children?
replies(1): >>Avshal+n2
2. Avshal+n2[view] [source] 2023-09-30 16:09:10
>>talos+(OP)
There's that. There's a cultural fear of aspartame that could cause people who don't like their child's diagnose to over report aspartame consumption* because they want something to blame. There's self selection in the study group (235 kids with autism vs 120 without is not a random population sample). I made the quip in another comment this is self reported consumption from memory.

*That 200+ vs 100+ ratio in the groups kinda implies they went looking for this specific connection rather than it just popping up as they did various regressions, and if you're looking for a specific connection it's easy to accidently-on-purpose pull in people who already believe in that connection which can color their recollection.

[go to top]