zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. cvoss+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-30 15:45:51
The claim is that there is a link for male offspring, not that there is no link for female offspring---that would be a very different claim.

From the abstract of the study [0]:

> No statistically significant associations were found in females.

[0] https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/15/17/3772

replies(1): >>cma+v1
◧
2. cma+v1[view] [source] 2023-09-30 15:52:30
>>cvoss+(OP)
If there had been the same percentage link on the female side could it have even then been claimed as statistically significant? Was it even possible for the study to show the same link with significance?
[go to top]