zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. dbingh+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-30 15:44:42
That line is much more a reference to lead in the gasoline, pfas and microplastics in the drinking water. It in fact costs quite a bit of money to avoid these compounds and in many cases the damage was already done before people were aware of the risk.

Meanwhile, the investors and executives of the companies that produced these compounds are quite wealthy.

replies(2): >>hinkle+q1 >>Walter+76
2. hinkle+q1[view] [source] 2023-09-30 15:51:01
>>dbingh+(OP)
It’s a very substantial aspect of “being poor is expensive”. Polluted places, and the sorts of places where pollution tends to collect, are undesirable and thus cheap. The rich historically buy the high land and thus are not affected as directly by flooding, which these days also comes with a dose of pollution.

Ironically all of the rich people migrating to waterfront property may be what finally gets us past where we are today with waterway pollution and global warming.

3. Walter+76[view] [source] 2023-09-30 16:18:55
>>dbingh+(OP)
The Soviet Union also poisoned their citizens.
replies(1): >>Aviceb+q7
◧◩
4. Aviceb+q7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-30 16:25:26
>>Walter+76
Sure, and they also suffered pretty hard in the long run ( the soviet union and citizens both)
[go to top]