zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. rpgwai+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-27 03:12:04
The author is referring to the officially recommended way to install home-assistant on a Linux box, which is just curl-ing and running an install script as root.

I totally get how that's off-putting, but the real recommended way to run home assistant is to install Home Assistant OS on dedicated hardware. Which also can be off-putting.

Either way, it's my favourite software that I regularly interact with (unless you count Linux).

replies(4): >>bluSCA+N >>move-o+k1 >>johnma+G3 >>phito+ia
2. bluSCA+N[view] [source] 2023-09-27 03:17:26
>>rpgwai+(OP)
This. This is what she meant. But the problem is, if you really like home automation and don't want to spend an arm and a leg buying just one spec, you'll have problems and will have to use multiple hubs.
3. move-o+k1[view] [source] 2023-09-27 03:20:40
>>rpgwai+(OP)
I just run it in a docker container along with zwave-js, which is also in a docker container.
replies(1): >>neuros+272
4. johnma+G3[view] [source] 2023-09-27 03:38:13
>>rpgwai+(OP)
I don't think that's really fair - the recommended way to run Home Assistant is to run HA OS (on a VM or dedicated machine, like a Raspberry Pi), or to run it in a Docker container.

The "Supervised" installation (i.e. installing Home Assistant on top of an existing Linux install) is doable, but not preferred.

https://www.home-assistant.io/installation/

replies(1): >>katbyt+66
◧◩
5. katbyt+66[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 03:54:36
>>johnma+G3
Iirc they explicitly say don’t / recommend against it. I mean I still did but it definitely isn’t the way most people will install it at all
replies(1): >>raman3+0d
6. phito+ia[view] [source] 2023-09-27 04:27:36
>>rpgwai+(OP)
Meanwhile on Windows, everyone gives admin rights to random installers without batting an eye.
◧◩◪
7. raman3+0d[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 04:49:43
>>katbyt+66
We tried, but the community wanted to keep the installation method, so we kept it around.
replies(1): >>katbyt+sN1
◧◩◪◨
8. katbyt+sN1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 15:46:28
>>raman3+0d
personally i did it because i like my servers to be debian & i wanted it to match all the other VMs i have running

so thanks for keeping it around :)

◧◩
9. neuros+272[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 16:59:19
>>move-o+k1
My only issue with running HA with docker is when I restart the machine, the docker container starts before my ZigBee dongle shows up in /dev/, which means all ZigBee devices are not accessible until I restarted the container. I ended up patching the docker unit file to add 2 minutes delay, but the patch will be reverted next time docker updated. I wonder if there is a better way to fix this.
replies(1): >>hiatus+3l2
◧◩◪
10. hiatus+3l2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 17:56:39
>>neuros+272
Depending on your setup, you might be able to use docker-compose with depends on and a health check to start your containers in an order and to await the device availability.
[go to top]