zlacker

[parent] [thread] 12 comments
1. lolind+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-27 02:37:34
Maybe this is what I'm missing—opening an app is far more fiddly to me than standing up, flipping a switch, and sitting back down. I have to get my phone out, open it, hope face ID works (you mentioned it was dark), enter my code if not, find the app, click the app, wait for it to load, find the right button...

Do other people not struggle with apps the way I do?

replies(6): >>nerdbe+s8 >>smiley+D8 >>c0pium+De >>jrockw+4h >>flemha+Cu >>59nadi+2Hb
2. nerdbe+s8[view] [source] 2023-09-27 03:39:37
>>lolind+(OP)
I don't generally find those interactions to be a struggle, but it's still 10x easier and faster to get up and turn on the light using the old-fashioned switch.
3. smiley+D8[view] [source] 2023-09-27 03:40:53
>>lolind+(OP)
4 ways to avoid an app

- schedule

- motion sensing

- voice

- routines / iftt (if it's a cloudy day, and zoom is open, then set brightness to x, maybe even open the shades)

replies(2): >>kQq9oH+cb >>komali+dd
◧◩
4. kQq9oH+cb[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 03:58:13
>>smiley+D8
- light switch
◧◩
5. komali+dd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 04:16:08
>>smiley+D8
> - motion sensing

> - voice

But we already solved that with "Clap on!" :D

replies(2): >>Corrad+Ov >>smiley+xg6
6. c0pium+De[view] [source] 2023-09-27 04:26:15
>>lolind+(OP)
Android and iOS both have the ability to have smart home controls in the notification shade/control center. Both also allow them to be used when the device is locked.
7. jrockw+4h[view] [source] 2023-09-27 04:44:36
>>lolind+(OP)
I have a battery-powered switch on my desk, so that avoids the need to use an app. Otherwise, I have my HA dashboard pinned in Chrome, so it's always one click away. And, you can have widgets on your phone's lock screen. I also don't like playing with my phone and don't use those.

If you don't need 'em or like the idea, don't spend $75 per switch. I got into smart lights because my apartment was apparently wired by a madman; the switch for my desk lights are right outside the bathroom. (Different circuit though!) I was very tired of walking that far to turn them on and off. I then replaced every other switch the week after, and have no regrets whatsoever, except maybe not having white tint adjustment. (I just have regular old LED bulbs. The switches are smart, not the bulbs.)

Once I was fully invested, I got a wall mount remote control that fits into a dual-gang faceplate (but only needs a single gang box), so I can control all of my lights when arriving or leaving. Very convenient.

Like others, I agree that automations are also nice. I have two fixtures outside that are unswitched. They turn on at sunset and off at sunrise now. No wasted electricity trying to overpower the sun. (Those are smart bulbs, of course.)

8. flemha+Cu[view] [source] 2023-09-27 06:58:04
>>lolind+(OP)
I'd do it from my computer instead of a phone.

But aside from that, do you have issues with Face ID in the dark? For me it works in pitch darkness. It sends out some laser light when scanning your face and hopefully not frying your eyes.

replies(1): >>lolind+dv1
◧◩◪
9. Corrad+Ov[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 07:08:42
>>komali+dd
10 years ago my young child had fairy lights hung up in her room. They were really pretty and not too bright. However she didn't really have a way to turn them on/off without unplugging them. So, I remembered the "Clap on!" device from years ago and thought it would be the perfect solution.

It turns out that they are hard to find and very expensive ($30) for what they are. Even if you can find them it's hard to tell if its an original unit or some super cheap knockoff that might burn your house down. :(

◧◩
10. lolind+dv1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 14:16:06
>>flemha+Cu
I have Android, not iPhone.
replies(1): >>flemha+4k8
◧◩◪
11. smiley+xg6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-28 18:03:51
>>komali+dd
Yes, "Clap on" is a valid competitor; it's not great in a room/house with multiple lights / rooms.

Motion sensing can be solved with Passive Infrared sensing light switches, it works great for my laundry, closets, and pantry.

◧◩◪
12. flemha+4k8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-29 09:20:20
>>lolind+dv1
Ah, sorry. Thought Face ID specifically referred to the Apple feature.
13. 59nadi+2Hb[view] [source] 2023-09-30 10:32:01
>>lolind+(OP)
I'm in the same boat as you (though generally not in the context of home automation and things) and I've also wondered the same thing. Using an app is just about the worst way I can interface with things and is only useful when it's the only possible way, like when I'm out and about.

One assumption I've made is that people just have much better and responsive phones than I do: I regularly wait 2-4 seconds for even the simplest things to happen on mine and it's overall a terrible experience. Overall I would say most phones I've had were like this at some point in their lifetime (often the majority of the lifetime), including a latest model Samsung phone that arguably was ahead of most available phones at the time.

I'm not sure what to think: I think it's just a matter of being used to a certain way of interacting with things in the end. Nothing's been able to replace a computer program for me, whether it be CLI, TUI or GUI.

As for home automation with apps vs. traditional switches and stuff I've always assumed that most of the stuff is done for coolness sake and because it's fun. Certainly what draws me to some of these things (though I haven't pulled the trigger on any of it) is that I could actually interface with the rest of the world from my computer, which I just think is a fun idea.

[go to top]