zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. akkart+(OP)[view] [source] 2007-02-21 20:29:00
I think comments are where the action is. Three simple things that get most of the bang of markdown IMO: Working permalinks for comments, paragraph dividers and clickable links.
replies(3): >>wicked+k >>rmack0+l >>pg+F81
2. wicked+k[view] [source] 2007-02-21 21:34:03
>>akkart+(OP)
There should be a page which lists the submissions that have recently been commented on. Otherwise, it's essentially meaningless to make thoughtful comments on old threads. Having a *hide* option would be welcome too.
replies(1): >>pg+G81
3. rmack0+l[view] [source] 2007-02-21 21:36:52
>>akkart+(OP)
For the time being, I'd settle for just converting newlines to br's. Adding hyperlinks before there's solid infrastructure for dealing with spam would be a mistake. I'll be surprised if more than few days go by before spam shows up, even without hyperlinks.
replies(1): >>pg+E
◧◩
4. pg+E[view] [source] [discussion] 2007-02-21 23:33:43
>>rmack0+l
Spam actually showed up the first day. Fortunately we already had good tools for dealing with it.
replies(1): >>icefox+sAk
5. pg+F81[view] [source] 2007-03-17 17:47:42
>>akkart+(OP)
done; we now have all three of these
◧◩
6. pg+G81[view] [source] [discussion] 2007-03-17 17:48:52
>>wicked+k
there is a prototype of this at news.ycombinator.com/active
replies(1): >>daniel+S81
◧◩◪
7. daniel+S81[view] [source] [discussion] 2007-03-17 18:55:37
>>pg+G81
That works well. A listing of the most active is better than a listing of recently commented on. What's the threshold for most active?
◧◩◪
8. icefox+sAk[view] [source] [discussion] 2007-11-13 21:30:30
>>pg+E
What type of spam do you get and how do you handle it?
[go to top]