zlacker

This looks awesome! Tangential question - do you find GPT function calling to work consistently and without error, or do you get errors when using it? By errors I mostly mean incorrect function signatures/types or missing values...but if you see other unpredictable behavior that would help too.

>>binary+(OP)
I haven't had much trouble with GPT 3.5 or 4 function calls returning in an undesirable format recently. I did get a few bad syntax responses when OpenAI first rolled it out, but not for the past few months.

Llama 2 can also pick the function call format up, given sufficient training data that contains function call responses, though you'll then have to parse the returned object out of the text-based response.

>>binary+(OP)
I see wrong responses about 1% of the time, but I love it, considering parsing raw text output without function calling had a much higher error rate.

>>Arctic+l4
Has anyone done such fine tuning on llama though? Afaik most projects like llama.cpp use grammars instead.

>>behnam+fx1
Yep! The linked notebook includes an example of exactly that (fine-tuning a 7b model to match the syntax of GPT-4 function call responses): https://github.com/OpenPipe/OpenPipe/blob/main/examples/clas...

>>Arctic+KE1
Thanks!