zlacker

Police should not be able to lie without a warrant.

>>SN7647+(OP)
What's the warrant supposed to do? If you don't want to talk to police, don't. If they have arrested you on probable cause, their having a warrant is the least of your concern.

>>SN7647+(OP)
If they do not disclose credentials, and they are defrauding and/or identity-thefting and thereby sabotaging one, is one fairly regarded as hostile and what is a fair use of force in self defense?

>>westur+sD
The force they use to kill you when you try this will be considered valid in court for sure.

>>giraff+Wh1
Scenario: A harasses/assails/defrauds/identity_thefts/sabotages B. (A does not disclose any credential of legal authority to B, who has the right to check the validity of A's credentials if claimed as material prior to such altercation.) Given self-defense right due to the initial positive hostile action of A, B is not legally obligated to request that the or a state pursue Due Process against A in the immediate or before the Statute of Limitations.

So, if someone is defrauding you, you have the right to self defense (and also Equal Protection of your Equal Rights).

>>lr4444+Ab
If the police are acting as a citizen to gather information, they should have a warrant. It cannot and should not be arbitrary.