zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. goto11+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-08 06:12:44
> many of them didn't bother watching the next one.

The third movie was still one of the most successful movies of all time.

replies(2): >>mauvia+I9 >>Andrew+Lr3
◧
2. mauvia+I9[view] [source] 2023-09-08 07:34:56
>>goto11+(OP)
The next movie was Solo, the first Star Wars Movie in a run of 10 to fail.
replies(1): >>goto11+uF1
◧◩
3. goto11+uF1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-08 17:16:51
>>mauvia+I9
Solo probably failed because the average cinema-goer does not want to see a Han Solo spin-off with Harrison Ford replaced by an unknown B-list actor.
replies(1): >>Andrew+Ir3
◧◩◪
4. Andrew+Ir3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-09 08:19:33
>>goto11+uF1
The actor was ok, btw, he was also very good in "Hail, Caesar".
◧
5. Andrew+Lr3[view] [source] 2023-09-09 08:21:22
>>goto11+(OP)
It takes more than one bad movie to kill a franchise of such magnitude. But I think Disney execs are going to persist in achieving this goal.
[go to top]