zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dnh44+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-08 01:44:36
You misread the comment you responded to; OP agrees with you.

> without any plot fundamentals that felt like a deep betrayal to the universe.

There should be a comma between “fundamentals” and “that”

replies(1): >>Jagerb+ff
2. Jagerb+ff[view] [source] 2023-09-08 04:09:16
>>dnh44+(OP)
I believe it should have actually been a semicolon.
replies(1): >>dnh44+6X3
◧◩
3. dnh44+6X3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-09 08:52:27
>>Jagerb+ff
It would have read a lot nicer with the semicolon and also if “that” were changed to “this”
[go to top]