zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. tptace+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-24 19:28:06
The canonical answer to this issue, which comes up over and over and over again on HN:

>>36219385

It's worth remembering that HN is a common law system. If you want to nerd out about what the real, fine-grained guidelines are, follow Dan's comments; they're the site jurisprudence.

A corollary to the humor thing: insubstantial comments are problematic when they're negative and less problematic when they're positive or encouraging. That's a principle that goes all the way back to Graham. So you're generally going to be fine attempting a cheerful joke than you are trying for a sly dunk.

replies(1): >>Gibbon+9f
2. Gibbon+9f[view] [source] 2023-08-24 20:53:27
>>tptace+(OP)
Humor is often a wrapper around something.

Malign people wrap antisocial stuff in order to get people to eat of it.

A joke with nothing inside it is just annoying and derailing. See the guy who always interrupts the conversation with a pun.

It is possible to wrap decent stuff with humor.

[go to top]