zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. raxxor+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-16 10:42:12
It isn't obvious at all. It doesn't help for that matter, but that is secondary. On the contrary, it is just a popular excuse to restrict speech because nothing about hate speech is objective. We see bad legislation around the globe and that will never protect any minority.

It is a bad idea and damaging and there is ample empirical evidence for that.

replies(2): >>icantb+lJ >>howint+UK1
2. icantb+lJ[view] [source] 2023-08-16 14:48:53
>>raxxor+(OP)
Please, link to the ample evidence. Quality research only, natch.
3. howint+UK1[view] [source] 2023-08-16 18:54:00
>>raxxor+(OP)
I love free speech, but you're going to have to convince me with a lot of evidence that Germany restricting pro-Nazi speech after WW2 was bad.
replies(1): >>apple4+Uy2
◧◩
4. apple4+Uy2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 22:57:31
>>howint+UK1
How about that restricting pro-Nazi speech before WW2 prevented nothing.
[go to top]