zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. jauco+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-16 05:43:54
Other than the privacy angle a meta redirect is always a bit slower than a location header. You need to send an html page (more bytes) that the browser needs to render and then act on (more work).

A location header is nearly unnoticeable, a meta refresh page gives you a flash of a blank interstitial screen.

(Not that I had the same annoyance, just explaining the difference to the end user of the two approaches)

replies(1): >>reimar+k34
2. reimar+k34[view] [source] 2023-08-17 08:41:34
>>jauco+(OP)
With the amount of bloat we have on the modern web, I think sending an HTML meta tag rather than a Location header should be the least of our concerns, when it comes to performance.

If the whole purpose of it is to have browsers send a Referer header, I don't think it's that bad. Even from a privacy perspective, you can configure browsers to not send that header anyway.

[go to top]