zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. seanhu+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-15 18:49:37
Unless it violates something like the Sherman Act[1]. Obviously we don’t know if they are actually doing this throttling and I don’t know whether it would be considered anticompetitive behaviour under that act but it is an example of where even though he has paid the money he doesn’t have the right to do so.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act

replies(1): >>openas+yd
2. openas+yd[view] [source] 2023-08-15 19:56:06
>>seanhu+(OP)
The Sherman Act doesn't ban "anticompetitive behavior" exactly, it bans anticompetitive agreements. If you own a company, you can do whatever you want to screw over your competition. If you get together with some of your rival companies and agree to work together to screw over the rest of the competition, then you run afoul of the law.
replies(1): >>seanhu+zj
◧◩
3. seanhu+zj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-15 20:28:13
>>openas+yd
I was thinking agreements were section 1 and anticompetitive behaviours were section 2. This bit https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/45

That said, I'm no expert and was just using it as an example.

[go to top]