zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. latchk+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-15 16:56:58
> That's a lot of domains!

Not really. 67k/350m=0.02%

replies(1): >>chromo+X3
2. chromo+X3[view] [source] 2023-08-15 17:11:44
>>latchk+(OP)
And 0.02% is really a lot.
replies(1): >>latchk+B6
◧◩
3. latchk+B6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-15 17:22:59
>>chromo+X3
Is it?
replies(1): >>warren+kL
◧◩◪
4. warren+kL[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-15 20:59:19
>>latchk+B6
0.02% of a big number ... is still a big number

0.02% of 10,000 is 2 - pretty small

0.02% of 1,000,000,000 is 200,000 ... kinda big :)

replies(1): >>chromo+0s1
◧◩◪◨
5. chromo+0s1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 01:53:22
>>warren+kL
In my opinion, absolute value is not important here, what matters is the fraction. I consider 0.02% to be large by itself for the given context.
replies(1): >>latchk+Ms1
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. latchk+Ms1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 02:00:44
>>chromo+0s1
What would be small?
replies(1): >>chromo+sx1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. chromo+sx1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 02:32:26
>>latchk+Ms1
This is subjective, but for me here a small fraction would be a few orders of magnitude less than that - few ten-millionths or less.
replies(1): >>latchk+sE1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. latchk+sE1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 03:45:47
>>chromo+sx1
Exactly, it is subjective, 0.02% is small in my opinion. Yet I'm getting downvoted and told that isn't small. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
replies(1): >>chromo+SG1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
9. chromo+SG1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 04:11:55
>>latchk+sE1
What's important here is the negative impact of the blacklist on communication. Probably some downvoters mean that the blacklist is big enough that the impact is important, and disagree with your supposed implication that it isn't.
replies(1): >>latchk+9H1
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
10. latchk+9H1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 04:14:35
>>chromo+SG1
Agreed, you're probably right about that.
[go to top]