zlacker

Yea I believe that’s the case here upon reading the statute closer. However given the newspaper had publicly said the documents were received from a source I am surprised a judge allowed a warrant. I am curious what evidence was presented and how it could have been more compelling than the public disclosure of a source.

>>fnordp+(OP)
Evidence could be extremely obvious, for example an IP addresses logging into a victim's account. It happens all the time.

Or it could be a trumped up accusation and an unconstitutional warrant.

We simply don't have the information. An honest an intelligent article would have articulated this question as the Crux of the matter, opposed to obfuscating it and claiming the warrant was unconstitutional.

I'm personally very opposed to a police corruption and overreach, but also hate skewed articles that mislead. Real reform needs to come from a place of accuracy opposed to hype and misinformation.