zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jimmas+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-06 15:37:54
Maybe this can be our magic bullet to save free content after we killed ads: train AI on user input/behavior (at least for a brief period of time until the EU throws another fit and California follows suit). Perfectly fair tradeoff to me - it should be fair use for AI to train on anything at all in my view, same as it's fair use for a human to look at something and learn abstract lessons from it.
replies(1): >>lewhoo+j3
2. lewhoo+j3[view] [source] 2023-08-06 15:59:24
>>jimmas+(OP)
Oh not the "like a human" again. But would you really allow any human on every zoom call ? I think this is a good example where this analogy breaks pretty obviously.
replies(1): >>jimmas+IJ
◧◩
3. jimmas+IJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-06 19:53:59
>>lewhoo+j3
It's the best of both worlds because an AI isn't a human - an AI learning from your private conversation is like letting a cat watch you go to the bathroom.
replies(1): >>lewhoo+xd2
◧◩◪
4. lewhoo+xd2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-07 07:58:46
>>jimmas+IJ
Now tell me with a straight face it doesn't feel a bit awkward to let your pet follow you to the bathroom. But on a more serious note, if the cat could convey messages of what he had heard, bits and peaces but also whole chunks it would've been a better analogy I think.
[go to top]