zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Peteri+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-06 15:17:54
For various reasons I have a bunch of different groups where I use different videocall software for regular meetings - Zoom, Jitsi, Teams, Skype, Google Meet and Webex.

Out of all those, Jitsi is the only one where I can't rely on the core functionality - video calls and screensharing for small meetings (5-6 people); I have had multiple cases when we've had to switch to something else because the video/audio quality simply wasn't sufficient, but a different tool worked just fine for the same people/computers/network.

Like, I fully understand the benefits of having a solution that's self-hosted and controlled, so we do keep using self-hosted Jitsi in some cases for all these reasons, but for whatever reason the core functionality performs significantly worse than the competitors. Like, I hate MS Teams due to all kinds of flaws it has, but when I am on a Teams meeting with many others, at least I don't have to worry if they will be able to hear me and see the data I'm showing.

replies(1): >>nicoco+J
2. nicoco+J[view] [source] 2023-08-06 15:22:18
>>Peteri+(OP)
Bigger servers?
replies(2): >>bob-09+MF >>smarx0+ok1
◧◩
3. bob-09+MF[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-06 19:11:35
>>nicoco+J
Not sure there would be a decent enough return on investment, especially if the other tools they regularly use provide more reliable service at no additional cost.
◧◩
4. smarx0+ok1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-06 23:19:27
>>nicoco+J
Won't help. I've had multiple callers encounter trouble with what I guess WebRTC traffic due to browser extensions, "anti" virus software, VPN policies etc. Zoom etc. works fine. They usually fixed it by switching to a personal phone instead of a work laptop but in general, the situation is not tenable.
[go to top]