For example, since the reddit exodus, I feel like we've had an uptick in "drive-by" comments (characteristic of reddit) where people just throw in some sort of unproductive, sometimes provocative comment with no intent of engaging.
Flagging is a nice way to clean up trash like that without having to pull in a moderator.
Given that some of the most influential tech people on the planet frequent HN (see Matt Cutts, etc.), I think it's critically important to discuss topics that are related simply to making the world a better place. Tech and tech people can help , but not if we can't even have the conversations.
If the richest and most influential people in tech are not even permitted to have these conversations, the chances of them getting fixed drops dramatically.
It feels like YCombinator wants to just keep shoving heads into sand on many, many topics because they're making money, and making money is the goal.
>lag should be a message to a mod if there is something heinous like gore on the front page. It’s used as a censorship button here and that isn’t cool
I mostly agree and that is how I use flag. I've never flagged a submnission, personally unless I felt the site was outright malware (I haven't experienced that here).
But I figure in this case flagging isn't too dissimilar to how reddit will hide submissions/comments with enough downvotes.