zlacker

War will be significantly more risky with no population growth

>>photon+(OP)
At art history museums you can see paintings of hundreds of cavalry men protecting a star shaped fort, nervously watching a mob of yesteryear patrons go about their day. Protecting capital meant hiring hundreds of flesh and blood soldiers back then.

In 2010 the same job could be done with 10 men holding machine guns. In 2030, we have drones. Humans need not apply.

>>tetris+V1
Could be done with 10 men? In 2023 Russia had significantly more than 10 men protecting Moscow from a rebellion. Thing is, you need more if the enemy also has the same weapons.

>>tetris+V1
Think one step further: if people become much more valuable and rare, targeting and killing them will become more valuable too.

>>nindal+H2
Tell me the total casualties haven't been on the whole declining since the dawn of time:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battles_by_casualties

>>photon+(OP)
And yet if resources are running out, what are your other options? Either you definitely die, or you fight and maybe die or maybe get more resources and don't die.