zlacker

The post states it. This is not a problem because Safari is not the leading web browser. Apple has very limited power over what they can do with it.

>>bezout+(OP)
Exactly. Websites will not require this version because they know that Safari is a minority market share and they can't force users to buy an Apple product. However if this is supported by Chrome and Safari all of a sudden the equation flips and many sites will feel that they can reject service to other users.

>>bezout+(OP)
Safari is not only leading browser in mobile, it is the only choice any iphone users have unlike chrome where user has choice to not use it. I would be more wary of safari changes than chrome changes.

>>YetAno+Bs
> Safari is not only leading browser in mobile

No it's not? Android has upwards of 70% of the mobile market[0], and Chrome has nearly 65% of the mobile browser market, compared to Safari with under 25%.[1]

> the only choice any iphone users have

Sort of. WebKit is the only choice iOS users have, but there are plenty of browsers available on iOS (including Chrome and Firefox) that use WebKit, not just Safari.

[0]https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide

[1]https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/world...