zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. XorNot+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:02:00
Such as? Everything I care about works fine. I've no idea what people are referring to when they say sites don't.
replies(1): >>rileym+W
2. rileym+W[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:06:12
>>XorNot+(OP)
I have had a couple of banking websites, I want to say wellsfargo corporate card login in, as well as video conference sites.
replies(1): >>cpeter+zB2
◧◩
3. cpeter+zB2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-27 00:08:47
>>rileym+W
If a website doesn’t work in Firefox (due to a bug in Firefox or the website or because the website blocks Firefox), please file a bug report on https://webcompat.com/

Mozilla developers will then try to reach out to the website’s owners, add a fix or workaround in Firefox, or (as a last resort) spoof Chrome’s User-Agent string to bypass the website’s Firefox block.

replies(1): >>rileym+TU2
◧◩◪
4. rileym+TU2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-27 02:29:17
>>cpeter+zB2
In some sense, doesn't the existence of that site kind of strongly indicate that the GP's point is correct. That there are spotty incompatibilities?
replies(1): >>cpeter+XX2
◧◩◪◨
5. cpeter+XX2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-27 02:58:21
>>rileym+TU2
Yes, but incompatibilities can’t be fixed if they’re not reported.
[go to top]