zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. merric+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-26 12:06:15
Earlier discussions:

Web Environment Integrity API Proposal – >>36817305 (618 points/4 days ago/442 comments)

Google Chrome Proposal – Web Environment Integrity – >>36778999 – (117 points/7 days ago/94 comments)

Web Environment Integrity Explainer – >>36785516 (87 points/6 days ago/44 comments)

replies(1): >>jvolkm+m4
◧
2. jvolkm+m4[view] [source] 2023-07-26 12:34:13
>>merric+(OP)
And related:

Apple already shipped attestation on the web, and we barely noticed - >>36862494 - (530 points/1 day ago/398 comments)

replies(1): >>Brian_+Cu
◧◩
3. Brian_+Cu[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-26 14:21:57
>>jvolkm+m4
As has been pointed out, Apple's captcha-skipper is rather different.
replies(1): >>jsnell+rX
◧◩◪
4. jsnell+rX[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-26 16:03:10
>>Brian_+Cu
Where was that pointed out? To me it seems that they are not all that different on any level[0]. Not in terms of expressed goals, nor in terms of technical capabilities for capacity to exclude minority browsers or operating systems if misused. The only real difference was PATs being launched with a very specific PR spin of "fewer captchas".

[0] https://www.snellman.net/blog/archive/2023-07-25-web-integri...

[go to top]