zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. elisha+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-25 17:24:35
> If Google forced it through but Apple refused, it would never be practical to enforce it. The numbers may not be as high, but they're plenty high enough that you couldn't cut all iDevices out.

Yes. Up until now, the amount of Google bullshit that Safari has saved us all from is _staggering._ It is unfortunate that this won't be another catastrophe deflected.

This is also why I'm concerned about legislation requiring Apple to open up sideloading onto their devices. As much as I love the idea of people having control over their own systems, in practice I'm afraid that it's just going to be the final nail that solidifies Google's complete control over the web all the way out to the client.

replies(1): >>mander+XM
2. mander+XM[view] [source] 2023-07-25 20:33:11
>>elisha+(OP)
While I don't even get your point, most people aren't going to sideload anything. Just like pretty much no one sideloads anything on their Android phone. It's irrelevant.
replies(1): >>consum+kf1
◧◩
3. consum+kf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-25 22:42:50
>>mander+XM
I thought DJI required sideloading on Android. Is this not the case anymore?

https://old.reddit.com/r/dji/comments/w8mkdd/why_must_the_dj...

[go to top]